The Supreme Court has refused a blanket extension for the December 6 Waqf registration deadline, directing caretakers to approach tribunals individually.
Brajesh Mishra
The Supreme Court of India today refused to grant a blanket extension for the mandatory registration of Waqf properties on the Centre's UMEED portal. With the statutory deadline of December 6 just five days away, the Bench led by Justice [B.R. Gavai] ruled that individual Waqf boards and caretakers must approach their respective state Tribunals if they need more time. This decision effectively greenlights the government’s aggressive push to digitize India's Waqf records under the new 2025 Amendment Act, despite fierce opposition claiming the timeline is impossible to meet.
The crisis stems from the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which came into force in April and mandated that all Waqf properties be registered on a central portal within six months. While the Supreme Court stayed some controversial provisions of the Act in September (like the "practicing Muslim" requirement), it left the registration mandate untouched. As the deadline approached, petitioners argued that technical glitches and the sheer volume of undocumented properties made compliance impossible, seeking a court-ordered pause. Today’s ruling rejects that pause.
While the headlines focus on the "Deadline Denied," the deeper story is the "Tribunal Bottleneck." The Supreme Court hasn't solved the problem; it has decentralized it. By shifting the burden of extension to local Waqf Tribunals, the court may have inadvertently triggered a bureaucratic collapse. These tribunals are often understaffed and under-resourced. If even a fraction of the estimated 10 lakh caretakers file urgent appeals this week, the system will likely gridlock. This isn't just a legal ruling; it's a stress test for India's lower judicial infrastructure, instigated by a digital mandate that refuses to acknowledge analog realities.
For Waqf caretakers, the clock is now ticking louder. Failure to register by December 6 could legally jeopardize the status of their properties. We can expect a frantic rush to the UMEED portal this week, likely followed by a wave of litigation in state courts as rejected applicants seek the "sufficient cause" extensions promised by the Solicitor General. Politically, this emboldens the Centre’s narrative of "transparency and digitization" while leaving the opposition to fight a fragmented battle across hundreds of local courtrooms instead of one decisive battle in Delhi.
If a 500-year-old property right can be erased because a server was down or a form wasn't filed in six months, is this digitization, or dispossession by database?
Did the Supreme Court extend the Waqf registration deadline? No. On December 1, 2025, the Supreme Court refused to grant a blanket extension of the December 6 deadline. Instead, it ruled that individual Waqf boards and caretakers must approach state Tribunals to seek extensions on a case-by-case basis.
How can I get an extension for Waqf property registration? Since the Supreme Court denied a general extension, you must file an application with your local Waqf Tribunal. You will need to prove "sufficient cause" for why you could not complete the registration on the UMEED portal within the original six-month window.
What is the last date for UMEED portal registration? The statutory deadline for registering Waqf properties on the UMEED portal is December 6, 2025, which is six months from the portal's launch date.
Why did the government mandate this registration? The government, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, argues that the registration is necessary to create a transparent, digital database of all Waqf assets, preventing encroachment and mismanagement.
News Coverage
Research & Analysis
Sign up for the Daily newsletter to get your biggest stories, handpicked for you each day.
Trending Now! in last 24hrs