The Supreme Court has ordered a CBI probe into "digital arrest" scams, citing ₹3,000 crore losses and international links. State police investigations are now transferred.
Brajesh Mishra
In a landmark directive, the Supreme Court of India has ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take over all investigations related to "digital arrest" scams from state police forces. The order, passed on November 30, 2025, comes after the Court took suo motu cognizance of a crisis that has cost Indians over ₹3,000 crore. A Bench led by Justice [Surya Kant] termed the fraud a "national menace" with cross-border roots in Myanmar and Thailand, necessitating a unified federal response rather than fragmented state-level probes.
The judiciary stepped in after a particularly harrowing case in October, where an elderly couple in [Ambala] was duped of ₹1.05 crore by fraudsters posing as CBI officials on a video call. This incident exposed the helplessness of local police against technically sophisticated syndicates. In a rare move on November 16, the Court restrained lower courts from granting bail to accused scammers to prevent evidence destruction. The transfer to the CBI signals that the judiciary now views this not just as fraud, but as a threat to national economic security.
While the headlines focus on the CBI vs. Scammers, the deeper story is the "Banker Nexus." The Supreme Court’s order explicitly empowers the CBI to "examine bankers." This is the smoking gun. ₹3,000 crore cannot leave the country without the complicity or negligence of the formal banking system. The scammers need hundreds of "mule accounts" to layer the money, and these accounts are often opened with the tacit approval of branch officials chasing targets. The CBI probe is likely to uncover that the real enablers of "digital arrest" aren't just in Myanmar, but in air-conditioned bank branches across India.
This order effectively federalizes cybercrime investigation for this specific modus operandi. It removes the jurisdiction hurdles that scammers exploited—committing a crime in Karnataka while sitting in Rajasthan with money flowing to Thailand. For victims, it offers a glimmer of hope for asset recovery, as the CBI has stronger international cooperation treaties for freezing offshore funds. However, it also puts pressure on the telecom sector, as the Court has directed the DoT to tighten SIM issuance norms to kill the "burner phone" supply chain.
If a scammer can impersonate the police on a video call for hours without being traced, is our digital infrastructure broken, or is it being kept broken for profit?
Will the CBI investigate my digital arrest case? Yes. The Supreme Court has ordered the transfer of relevant FIRs from state police to the CBI to ensure a unified, cross-border investigation. However, the agency will likely prioritize dismantling the syndicate leadership over individual petty cases initially.
What did the Supreme Court say about digital arrest scams? The Court termed the scams a "national menace" and a threat to public trust. It expressed shock at the ₹3,000 crore loss and emphasized that local police lack the jurisdiction and resources to tackle international syndicates operating from Myanmar and Thailand.
Can I get bail in a digital arrest case? It is now much harder. On November 16, 2025, the Supreme Court restrained lower courts from granting bail to accused persons in specific digital arrest cases to prevent them from destroying digital evidence or fleeing.
How do digital arrest scams work? Scammers use video calls (often via WhatsApp or Skype) to impersonate police or CBI officials. They use AI-generated backgrounds of police stations and fake uniforms to terrify victims into believing they are under "digital arrest" for money laundering or drug crimes, coercing them to transfer money.
News Coverage
Research & Analysis
Sign up for the Daily newsletter to get your biggest stories, handpicked for you each day.
Trending Now! in last 24hrs