Prashant Kishor’s Jan Suraaj contested 238 seats but won none in Bihar 2025. A credibility gap, no caste base, and strategic flaws drove the zero-seat collapse.
Brajesh Mishra
Prashant Kishor’s Jan Suraaj Party, which contested 238 of 243 seats in the 2025 Bihar Assembly election, failed to win even one constituency. Despite a 3,000 km padyatra and a year-long grassroots build-up, the party finished with zero seats and only around 4% vote share. The result marks a dramatic setback for Kishor, one of India’s most celebrated political strategists.
Prashant Kishor launched Jan Suraaj in 2022 as a grassroots, reform-led platform. His padyatra covered more than 3,000 km, promising a citizen-first governance model. Kishor claimed he represented a “third alternative” beyond the NDA and Mahagathbandhan.
But the party’s expansion was rapid and uneven — fielding candidates in 238 constituencies without established cadre, booth networks, or regional alliances. Kishor publicly declared his party would win “either less than 10 or more than 150 seats,” and even promised he would quit politics if JD(U) crossed 25 seats — JD(U) went on to win 85.
Prashant Kishor – founder of Jan Suraaj; architect of multiple national election victories but failed to convert strategy into votes for himself.
Jan Suraaj candidates – many were first-timers with limited booth-level presence.
RJD & Mahagathbandhan – alleged Kishor acted as a vote cutter in RJD strongholds.
NDA – indirectly benefited from Jan Suraaj splitting anti-NDA votes in multiple seats.
Political analyst Deepak Kochgave suggested Kishor’s campaign “disproportionately targeted RJD zones,” arguing it may have functioned as a “controlled opposition mechanism.” (Source: Hindustan Times)
Most reports frame Jan Suraaj’s wipeout as inexperience and lack of organisation. But the deeper story lies in credibility mismatch — Kishor’s personal brand as a strategist did not translate into voter trust as a politician.
Key structural factors were ignored:
Jan Suraaj became too broad to be focused and too new to be trusted.
Kishor’s zero-seat result reshapes Bihar’s political experimentation space. It signals that Bihar’s electorate — especially after the women–EBC realignment — is not ready for “third alternatives” without deep social roots.
Nationally, Kishor’s defeat weakens his influence as a political advisor. His earlier prediction-based bravado (“less than 10 or above 150 seats”) now risks haunting his credibility.
For voters, activists, and analysts, Jan Suraaj’s failure is a reminder that mass movements require caste structure, cadre networks, and ideological clarity — not just digital messaging or padyatras.
If the architect of India’s biggest election victories cannot build trust as a politician, what does that say about the gap between designing politics and practicing it?
India Today – Jan Suraaj scores zero
YouTube – Jan Suraaj fails to win
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsaDoS4AFEU
Hindustan Times – Kishor failed to move the needle
NDTV – Bihar results live
Economic Times – NDA wave analysis
Wikipedia – 2025 Bihar election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Bihar_Legislative_Assembly_election
Exclusive Content
Sign up for the Daily newsletter to get your biggest stories, handpicked for you each day.
Trending Now! in last 24hrs
