The Supreme Court has granted interim bail to activist Jyoti Jagtap in the Elgar Parishad case after she spent over five years in jail without trial.
Brajesh Mishra
The Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to activist Jyoti Jagtap on November 18, 2025, ending her more than five-year imprisonment in the controversial Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case. A bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Satish Chandra Sharma passed the order, explicitly citing that Jagtap, a member of the Kabir Kala Manch (KKM) cultural troupe, has been in custody since September 2020 without charges being framed or a trial commencing. The relief extends until her next hearing in February 2026.
Jagtap was arrested at age 27 for her participation in the Elgar Parishad event on December 31, 2017, which the National Investigation Agency (NIA) alleges incited violence at Bhima Koregaon the following day. Despite the NIA labeling her a member of a "Maoist front organization," Jagtap has languished in Byculla Jail for 66 months. Her bail pleas were repeatedly rejected by lower courts, including the Bombay High Court in 2022, which deemed the allegations against her "prima facie true" based on her performance of anti-establishment songs.
While the headlines celebrate Jagtap's release, the deeper story is the systemic collapse of due process. Granting bail after five years is not a victory of justice; it is an admission of failure. Jagtap spent half a decade in prison not because she was convicted, but because the legal system allowed "process as punishment." Furthermore, this bail comes too late for co-accused Father Stan Swamy, who died in custody awaiting a similar hearing. The release of Jagtap forces a reckoning: How can a democracy imprison its citizens for years without even framing charges?
This verdict sets a crucial precedent for the remaining political prisoners in the Bhima Koregaon case and other UAPA detainees. It signals that the Supreme Court is increasingly unwilling to accept "seriousness of allegations" as a justification for indefinite pre-trial incarceration. However, the continued reliance on "interim" relief (as seen with co-accused Mahesh Raut) rather than full acquittal or case dismissal suggests the judiciary is still navigating a cautious path, offering temporary liberty without dismantling the underlying UAPA framework that enables such detentions.
If a cultural performance can cost a young woman five years of her life without a trial, is the law protecting the state, or silencing its critics?
Who is Jyoti Jagtap? Jyoti Jagtap is a cultural activist and member of the Kabir Kala Manch (KKM). She was the youngest accused arrested in the Elgar Parishad-Bhima Koregaon case in September 2020 for her alleged role in "inciting violence" through her performances.
Why was Jyoti Jagtap arrested? She was arrested by the NIA under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The agency alleged she was part of a "Maoist front organization" and that her songs and plays at the Elgar Parishad event in 2017 incited the caste violence that followed at Bhima Koregaon.
Why did Jyoti Jagtap spend 5 years in jail without trial? Despite being chargesheeted in October 2020, charges were never formally framed by the court, preventing the trial from starting. The stringent provisions of the UAPA make bail difficult, allowing the state to keep the accused in custody for years during the "pre-trial" phase.
How many Bhima Koregaon accused have been released? As of November 2025, only a few of the 16 accused have been granted bail, including Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira, Mahesh Raut, Sudhir Dhawale, Rona Wilson, and now Jyoti Jagtap. Father Stan Swamy died in custody awaiting bail.
News Coverage
Research & Analysis
Sign up for the Daily newsletter to get your biggest stories, handpicked for you each day.
Trending Now! in last 24hrs