BIGSTORY Network


International News Nov. 17, 2025, 6 p.m.

Sheikh Hasina Sentenced to Death in Absentia for 2024 Protest Crackdown

Bangladesh's ICT sentences former PM Sheikh Hasina to death in absentia for crimes against humanity in the 2024 student protests, sparking an extradition crisis with India.

by Author Sseema Giill
Hero Image

On November 17, 2025, Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) sentenced former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to death in absentia. The 78-year-old leader, currently in exile in India, was convicted on three counts of crimes against humanity for her role in the violent state crackdown on a student-led uprising in July-August 2024. That crackdown resulted in the deaths of 800 to 1,400 people, marking the deadliest political violence in Bangladesh since its 1971 independence war.

The Context (How We Got Here)

The crisis began in July 2024 as student protests over a job quota system. Hasina's government responded with escalating force, including live ammunition, helicopters, and drones. Leaked audio, reportedly verified by forensic analysis, allegedly captured Hasina ordering action against protesters. The violence culminated in Hasina fleeing to India on August 5, 2024. Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus took charge of an interim government, which then activated the ICT—a tribunal Hasina herself established in 2009—to try her and her administration. The six-month trial concluded today, convicting Hasina based on over 10,000 pages of evidence and testimony from 80+ witnesses.

The Key Players (Who & So What)

  • Sheikh Hasina (Former PM): Sentenced to death. From her exile in India, she has rejected the verdict as "biased and politically motivated" and a "kangaroo court" designed to eliminate her from politics.
  • Muhammad Yunus (Interim Govt. Chief Adviser): Leads the government that brought the charges. His administration is now formally demanding India extradite Hasina, stating that sheltering her is an "act of hostility against Bangladesh."
  • Justice Golam Mortuza Mozumder (ICT Chief Judge): Authored the 453-page judgment. He found Hasina legally responsible for "incitement," "ordering the use of lethal weapons," and "failure to prevent" the atrocities.
  • Sreeradha Datta (South Asian Studies Professor): Represents the expert consensus that India will not extradite Hasina, citing the 2013 treaty's "political motivation" exception and the "fragile" state of India-Bangladesh relations.

The BIGSTORY Reframe (The BigStory Angle)

While most reports are focusing on the historic death sentence as "justice served" for the 2024 atrocities, the deeper story is the crisis of the tribunal's own legitimacy. The very court Sheikh Hasina created to try 1971 war criminals is now being used against her by an unelected interim government that has also banned her party from elections. This raises profound questions of whether the verdict is credible accountability based on evidence (like the forensic audio) or a sophisticated form of political retribution.

The Implications (Why This Changes Things)

This verdict plunges India-Bangladesh relations into a severe crisis. Bangladesh is demanding extradition, but India is signaling refusal, creating a major diplomatic stalemate. Domestically, the verdict solidifies the interim government's narrative ahead of the planned 2026 elections, from which Hasina's Awami League party is already banned. The verdict's date—Hasina's 58th wedding anniversary—is seen by her supporters as a deliberate, symbolic humiliation, further undermining the trial's claims to impartial justice.

The Closing Question (Now, Think About This)

When a state uses a tribunal—however flawed—to hold a former leader accountable for mass atrocities, where does legitimate justice end and a political vendetta begin?

FAQs

What are Sheikh Hasina's specific crimes according to the tribunal? She was convicted on three counts of crimes against humanity: 1) Incitement to kill protesters, 2) Ordering the use of lethal weapons (helicopters, drones, firearms), and 3) Failing to prevent atrocities by her security forces during the July-August 2024 student uprising.

Will India extradite Sheikh Hasina to Bangladesh? It is highly unlikely. Experts note the 2013 India-Bangladesh extradition treaty allows India to refuse an extradition request if the conviction is deemed "politically motivated," which is Hasina's primary defense and a charge the Yunus government denies.

How many people died in the July 2024 student uprising in Bangladesh? The exact number is disputed. The Bangladesh health ministry confirmed over 800 deaths, while the UN Human Rights Office and other estimates place the figure as high as 1,400, making it the nation's deadliest political violence since 1971.

Is the Bangladesh tribunal that sentenced Hasina legitimate? Its legitimacy is contested. While the tribunal presented substantial evidence (10,000+ pages, 80+ witnesses, forensic audio), it was established by Hasina herself in 2009. Critics, including Hasina, argue the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus is now using it as a political tool to eliminate her and her Awami League party.

FAQs

What are Sheikh Hasina's specific crimes according to the tribunal? She was convicted on three counts of crimes against humanity: 1) Incitement to kill protesters, 2) Ordering the use of lethal weapons (helicopters, drones, firearms), and 3) Failing to prevent atrocities by her security forces during the July-August 2024 student uprising.

Will India extradite Sheikh Hasina to Bangladesh? It is highly unlikely. Experts note the 2013 India-Bangladesh extradition treaty allows India to refuse an extradition request if the conviction is deemed "politically motivated," which is Hasina's primary defense and a charge the Yunus government denies.

How many people died in the July 2024 student uprising in Bangladesh? The exact number is disputed. The Bangladesh health ministry confirmed over 800 deaths, while the UN Human Rights Office and other estimates place the figure as high as 1,400, making it the nation's deadliest political violence since 1971.

Is the Bangladesh tribunal that sentenced Hasina legitimate? Its legitimacy is contested. While the tribunal presented substantial evidence (10,000+ pages, 80+ witnesses, forensic audio), it was established by Hasina herself in 2009. Critics, including Hasina, argue the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus is now using it as a political tool to eliminate her and her Awami League party.

Sources

News Coverage

Research & Analysis


Sseema Giill
Sseema Giill Founder & CEO

Sseema Giill is an inspiring media professional, CEO of Screenage Media Pvt Ltd, and founder of the NGO AGE (Association for Gender Equality). She is also the Founder CEO and Chief Editor at BIGSTORY NETWORK. Giill champions women's empowerment and gender equality, particularly in rural India, and was honored with the Champions of Change Award in 2023.

BIGSTORY Trending News! Trending Now! in last 24hrs

From Sanctuary to Suspect: Trump Orders Review of All 2021 Afghan Arrivals
International News
From Sanctuary to Suspect: Trump Orders Review of All 2021 Afghan Arrivals
The "Coaching" Scandal: Why Trump’s Peace Envoy is Advising the Other Side
International News
The "Coaching" Scandal: Why Trump’s Peace Envoy is Advising the Other Side
Putin Calls Trump's Plan a "Basis" for Peace, But Refuses to Stop Fighting
International News
Putin Calls Trump's Plan a "Basis" for Peace, But Refuses to Stop Fighting
Burqa Ban Backfire: One Nation Leader Ejected from Parliament
International News
Burqa Ban Backfire: One Nation Leader Ejected from Parliament