President Trump appoints Jeff Landry as Special Envoy to acquire Greenland, sparking a diplomatic crisis with Denmark. The move signals a shift to an "Arctic Monroe Doctrine."
Sseema Giill
President Donald Trump has turned a controversial campaign idea into official US foreign policy, formally appointing Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as the "US Special Envoy to Greenland" on December 22, 2025. The appointment, announced via Truth Social, explicitly tasks Landry with "advancing US interests" to bring the autonomous Danish territory under American control. The move has triggered an immediate diplomatic rupture within NATO, with Denmark announcing it will summon the US ambassador to protest what it views as a direct challenge to its territorial integrity.
The saga began in 2019 when Trump first floated the idea of buying Greenland, a proposal dismissed at the time by the Danish Prime Minister as "absurd." Six years later, the "large real estate deal" has evolved into a national security imperative. On December 20, Trump declared, "We have to have it," drawing parallels to the 1867 purchase of Alaska for $7.2 million. He argues that Greenland—which is 25% larger than Alaska—is vital for American dominance in the Arctic. Landry’s acceptance of the role was unequivocal; he publicly stated his mission is "to make Greenland a part of the US," stripping away any diplomatic ambiguity.
While mainstream media frames this as "Trump’s Real Estate Fantasy," the deeper story is the "Energy Annexation Strategy." The selection of Jeff Landry is the tell. As the governor of a state synonymous with the petrochemical industry, Landry’s appointment suggests the US objective is to unlock Greenland’s frozen hydrocarbon and rare earth mineral reserves—resources essential for the AI hardware supply chain.
Furthermore, this marks the launch of an "Arctic Monroe Doctrine." By moving from "cooperation" to "acquisition," the US is signaling that it no longer views the Arctic as a global common, but as a contested security zone where physical ownership of the terrain is required to deny access to adversaries. The US is effectively attempting a hostile corporate takeover of a geopolitical ally's territory.
This appointment forces the Danish Realm into an existential crisis. If Nuuk (Greenland’s capital) is enticed by US economic promises, it could drive a wedge between Greenland and Denmark. For NATO, it creates a bizarre scenario where the alliance’s leading power is actively trying to annex the territory of a member state, potentially paralyzing Arctic security cooperation just as Russian activity in the region intensifies.
If the US views buying a sovereign territory as a standard "transaction" for national security, which strategic ally is safe from receiving an offer they can't refuse?
Who is the US special envoy for Greenland appointed by Trump in 2025? President Donald Trump appointed Jeff Landry, the Governor of Louisiana, as the US Special Envoy to Greenland on December 22, 2025. Landry accepted the role in a "volunteer" capacity.
Why does the US want to buy Greenland? President Trump has stated the acquisition is necessary for national security, citing Greenland's strategic location in the Arctic and its vast natural resources. He has compared the potential deal to the historic purchase of Alaska in 1867.
What was Denmark's reaction to the US Greenland envoy appointment? Denmark reacted with sharp criticism, with Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen stating the move "undermines our sovereignty." Copenhagen announced it would summon the US ambassador to formally protest the appointment.
News Coverage
Diplomatic Reaction
Sign up for the Daily newsletter to get your biggest stories, handpicked for you each day.
Trending Now! in last 24hrs