Senator Pauline Hanson has been suspended from the Australian Parliament for seven days after wearing a burqa in the chamber. The move sparked outrage and fears of rising hate crimes.
Sseema Giill
Far-right Senator Pauline Hanson was suspended from the Australian Senate on November 25, 2025, for seven sitting days—one of the harshest penalties in recent history—after entering the chamber wearing a black burqa. The stunt, staged on November 24 to protest the rejection of her bill to ban full-face coverings, triggered immediate outrage. Senate leadership condemned the act as "hateful pageantry," while the presence of two Muslim senators, who were absent during a similar stunt in 2017, ensured a swift institutional backlash this time.
This is not Hanson's first provocation. Since 2015, she has campaigned to ban the burqa on national security grounds, despite ASIO threat assessments consistently citing right-wing extremism—not Islamic dress—as a rising danger. In 2017, she performed an identical stunt without legislative penalty. However, the political landscape has shifted. With One Nation polling at 15-18% and doubling its Senate seats in May 2025, Hanson is escalating her anti-immigration rhetoric. The difference now is the composition of the Senate: the presence of Muslim senators Mehreen Faruqi and Fatima Payman turned a monologue into a confrontation.
While the headlines focus on the suspension, the deeper story is the "Real-World Casualty Count." Hanson's parliamentary theater doesn't stay in Canberra; it migrates instantly to the streets. Within 24 hours, community leaders reported incidents of harassment against Muslim schoolgirls, validating Penny Wong's warning. This isn't just about decorum; it's a case study in "stochastic incitement," where high-profile political stunts legitimize low-level community violence. The media treats it as a debate over dress codes, but for Muslim women on public transport today, it is a debate over safety.
The seven-day suspension sets a new precedent: racism in parliament now carries a material cost. It signals that the "free speech" defense for hate speech is losing institutional traction. However, for Hanson, the martyrdom of suspension feeds her "silenced outsider" narrative, potentially hardening her support base. The incident also exposes the fragility of Australia's multicultural consensus, forcing mainstream parties like the Coalition to finally pick a side after years of treating Hanson as a fringe curiosity.
If a senator is punished for wearing a burqa to mock it, but her party's poll numbers rise because of it, who is actually winning the argument?
What did Pauline Hanson do in the Australian Senate? On November 24, 2025, Senator Pauline Hanson entered the Senate chamber wearing a black burqa to protest the rejection of her bill to ban full-face coverings. She removed it after being asked, but the stunt led to a formal censure and suspension.
Why was Pauline Hanson suspended? She was suspended for seven sitting days for "disrespectful" conduct that was deemed to mock the Muslim faith and violate parliamentary standards. Senate leaders described the act as "hateful pageantry" that could incite community violence.
Is this the first time she has done this? No. Hanson performed a similar stunt in 2017. However, she faced no legislative penalty at that time. The presence of Muslim senators in 2025 significantly changed the institutional response.
How did Muslim senators respond? Senators Mehreen Faruqi and Fatima Payman strongly condemned the act. Payman called it "disgraceful" and "unconstitutional," while Faruqi labeled Hanson a "racist senator" engaging in "blatant racism."
Does Australia have a burqa ban? No. There is no federal law banning the burqa or other full-face coverings in public in Australia, although some states have laws requiring faces to be visible for identification purposes (e.g., by police).
News Coverage
Research & Analysis
Sign up for the Daily newsletter to get your biggest stories, handpicked for you each day.
Trending Now! in last 24hrs