BIGSTORY Network


India Dec. 29, 2025, 11:02 p.m.

Rahul Gandhi Calls It a "Hate Crime": The Politics Behind the Tripura Student Killing

Rahul Gandhi condemns the "hate crime" killing of Tripura student Anjel Chakma in Dehradun. 11 years after Nido Taniam, India still lacks an anti-racism law.

by Author Brajesh Mishra
Hero Image

The haunting last words of 24-year-old Anjel Chakma—"We are not Chinese. We are Indians"—have become the rallying cry for a nation confronting its own prejudice. On December 29, 2025, Opposition Leader Rahul Gandhi condemned the death of the MBA student from Tripura as a "horrific hate crime," attributing the violence to "toxic narratives" normalized by the ruling BJP. Anjel succumbed to stab wounds on December 26, seventeen days after being attacked by a group in Dehradun who hurled racial slurs like "Chinese" and "momo." But beyond the political condemnation lies a systemic failure: Anjel’s death is a near-exact replay of the 2014 Nido Taniam killing, exposing that despite 11 years of promises, India has passed zero legislation to punish racial hate crimes.

The Context (How We Got Here)

The attack occurred on the evening of December 9 in Dehradun’s Selaqui market. Anjel and his brother Michael were confronted by six men who mocked their ethnicity before stabbing Anjel in the neck and abdomen. While police have arrested five accused (including two juveniles) and launched a manhunt for a sixth suspect in Nepal, they have officially denied a racial motive—a stance that directly contradicts witness testimony. This denial fits a historical pattern. In 2014, when Nido Taniam was beaten to death in Delhi, the resulting Bezbaruah Committee recommended a specific anti-racism law (Section 153C IPC). That law was never enacted. Today, hate speech incidents have surged 74.4% in just one year (2024), creating a climate where such violence is statistically predictable, not anomalous.

The Key Players (Who & So What)

  • Rahul Gandhi (Leader of Opposition): The accuser. By explicitly labeling this a "hate crime" fueled by "hate-spewing leadership," Gandhi is attempting to pin the moral culpability on the BJP’s ideological ecosystem, though his own party has yet to propose a concrete legislative alternative.
  • Tarun Prasad Chakma (The Father): The witness. A BSF constable who serves the nation, his testimony—"My child had gone to buy vegetables... We are Indians"—dismantles the police narrative of a "sudden brawl" and frames it as an existential attack on citizenship.
  • Shashi Tharoor (Congress MP): The reformer. calling the incident a "national disgrace," Tharoor highlights the institutional rot—from school textbooks that ignore Northeast history to a media ecosystem that treats the region as foreign.

The BIGSTORY Reframe

While mainstream coverage focuses on the tragedy, the real story is the "Institutional Denial Mechanism." The police refusal to register a racial motive is strategic. Admitting to a hate crime would require acknowledging systemic discrimination, a reality the state apparatus is desperate to avoid. Instead, the crime is sanitized as a "clash," erasing the racial slurs that triggered it.

Furthermore, the "Casual Mockery Supply Chain" remains unexamined. The racial slurs used against Anjel didn't emerge from a vacuum; they are amplified daily by YouTube creators and social media algorithms that normalize anti-Northeast humor as "content." This violence didn't start with a knife in Dehradun; it started in the comment sections of viral videos that dehumanize 45 million Indians for clicks.

The Implications (Why This Changes Things)

With student unions mobilizing in Delhi and Agartala, the demand for the long-dormant Anti-Racism Law is back on the table. The disparity in rewards—₹10 lakh from a regional party vs. ₹25,000 from the government—signals that for Northeast citizens, justice is often a regional concern rather than a national priority. Unless Parliament acts to criminalize racial bias, Anjel Chakma will be just another name on a list that started with Nido Taniam.

The Closing Question (Now, Think About This)

If a BSF soldier’s son has to die proving he is Indian, what does that say about the value of the flag his father defends?

FAQs

What happened to Anjel Chakma in Dehradun? On December 9, 2025, 24-year-old MBA student Anjel Chakma was attacked by six men in Dehradun who hurled racial slurs like "Chinese" at him. He was stabbed and succumbed to his injuries on December 26. Police have arrested five suspects.

Why are Northeast students discriminated against in India? Discrimination stems from historical stereotyping, exclusion of Northeast history from national curricula, and media portrayals of the region as "foreign" or "backward." This is amplified by social media content that normalizes racial mockery.

Does India have an anti-racism law? No. despite the 2014 Bezbaruah Committee recommending a specific law (Section 153C IPC) following Nido Taniam's death, no such legislation has been passed in the last 11 years. Racial crimes are prosecuted under general murder or assault laws.

Sources

News Coverage

Context & Analysis


Brajesh Mishra
Brajesh Mishra Associate Editor

Brajesh Mishra is an Associate Editor at BIGSTORY NETWORK, specializing in daily news from India with a keen focus on AI, technology, and the automobile sector. He brings sharp editorial judgment and a passion for delivering accurate, engaging, and timely stories to a diverse audience.

BIGSTORY Trending News! Trending Now! in last 24hrs

The "Fugitive" Joke That Backfired: Inside Lalit Modi & Vijay Mallya’s London Party
India
The "Fugitive" Joke That Backfired: Inside Lalit Modi & Vijay Mallya’s London Party
Rahul Gandhi Calls It a "Hate Crime": The Politics Behind the Tripura Student Killing
India
Rahul Gandhi Calls It a "Hate Crime": The Politics Behind the Tripura Student Killing
"Does Justice Depend on Hashtags?": Sengar’s Daughter Writes to SC
India
"Does Justice Depend on Hashtags?": Sengar’s Daughter Writes to SC
"The People Must Decide": Zelenskyy's Referendum Gamble Explained
India
"The People Must Decide": Zelenskyy's Referendum Gamble Explained