Retired IAF officer Awadhesh Pathak shot in Lucknow (Jan 30). Critical condition. Police suspect business rivalry. Second attack on veterans in UP this month.
Brajesh Mishra
Late last night, January 30, 2026, the upscale Sushant Golf City township in Lucknow became the scene of a brazen attack when Awadhesh Kumar Pathak (60), a retired Indian Air Force (IAF) officer, was shot and critically injured by bike-borne assailants. The incident occurred at approximately 10:30 PM as Pathak was walking to his car after closing his restaurant, "Cloud Kitchen," in the Ansal API area.
This targeted hit marks the second major attack on a retired defense serviceman in Uttar Pradesh in just five weeks, triggering alarm among the veteran community who are increasingly viewing themselves as "soft targets" in the state's chaotic civilian property market. Pathak is currently fighting for his life at Medanta Hospital, having sustained a gunshot wound to the abdomen.
While media headlines scream "Law and Order Failure," the structural issue is the vulnerability of the transitioning veteran.
If a man who spent 30 years guarding the nation’s borders cannot walk safely to his car in a "secure" gated colony, is the premium we pay for these townships buying us safety, or just an illusion of it?
1. Is Awadhesh Kumar Pathak alive? Yes. As of the latest update (4:45 PM IST, Jan 31), Awadhesh Kumar Pathak is alive but in critical condition. He underwent emergency surgery at Medanta Hospital, Lucknow, to remove a bullet from his abdomen.
2. Who shot the retired Air Force officer in Lucknow? The shooters are currently unidentified. Eyewitnesses described them as two men on a motorcycle who were lying in wait. Police suspect they are contract killers hired by a business or property rival.
3. Is Sushant Golf City safe? The incident has raised serious questions about safety. Despite being a "posh" township, residents complain of lax security at entry gates, allowing unverified access to delivery agents and outsiders. The Residents' Association is demanding an immediate security audit.
4. Was this a robbery attempt? No. Police have ruled out robbery as the motive. The assailants did not attempt to take Pathak's car, cash, or mobile phone. They fired shots and immediately fled, indicating a targeted attack rooted in enmity.
5. How is this connected to the Ghaziabad case? There is no direct link between the attackers, but the pattern is similar. In both cases (Dec 2025 and Jan 2026), retired IAF officers were targeted shortly after entering civilian life/business. The Ghaziabad case was a property dispute involving family; the Lucknow case is suspected to be a business rivalry.
News Coverage
Sign up for the Daily newsletter to get your biggest stories, handpicked for you each day.
Trending Now! in last 24hrs